Offtopic

20 Feb 2021, 5:09pm
It's also sheer populism. If there are a lot of such old idiots and someone wants to get elected they're gonna promise improvements for retired folks and not better digital infrastructure which most of them have no idea how to use anyway.

Post edited/moved by: Artie, 21 Feb 2021, 12:48am
20 Feb 2021, 5:56pm
Rebecca HailThe boomer effect is when a bunch of old, technology averse folks blocks the construction of cellphone towers or fiber optic cables in their backwater village

While we're not exactly old and tech-averse, our laziness to upgrade our contract makes us part of the problem, doesn't it? Serving broadband to rural areas is a costly affair and makes sense only if there's enough demand and ROI.


Post edited/moved by: Artie, 21 Feb 2021, 12:49am
20 Feb 2021, 5:57pm
Sakashiro
Rebecca HailThe boomer effect is when a bunch of old, technology averse folks blocks the construction of cellphone towers or fiber optic cables in their backwater village


While we're not exactly old and tech-averse, our laziness to upgrade our contract makes us part of the problem, doesn't it? Serving broadband to rural areas is a costly affair and makes sense only if there's enough demand and ROI.


No. I'm not talking about people not willing to upgrade, I'm talking about people actively working against any effort to upgrade the infrastructure.


Post edited/moved by: Artie, 21 Feb 2021, 12:49am
20 Feb 2021, 6:32pm
I'm aware there are people who don't want to live near cell towers, but I haven't yet heard of people rallying against landline upgrades tbh.

What I have heard of is people in rural towns asking their ISPs for broadband internet and getting responses such as "Sorry, there are currently no plans to upgrade your area."


Post edited/moved by: Artie, 21 Feb 2021, 12:49am
20 Feb 2021, 6:51pm
Yeah, the NIMBYism is much more a problem for cell phone towers than for landline upgrades. You get the occasional idiot there too though.

Post edited/moved by: Artie, 21 Feb 2021, 12:49am
20 Feb 2021, 10:48pm
Igneel PrimeIt's also sheer populism. If there are a lot of such old idiots and someone wants to get elected they're gonna promise improvements for retired folks and not better digital infrastructure which most of them have no idea how to use anyway.

I think even worse are cases when the money are taken both from infrastructure development and retirement funding what happened back in a day where I live. I already chatted on that subject with Igneel in private due to how dangerously close to political discussion it is for INARA, especially when we take into account very weird medial coverage that sometimes puts stuff so bizarrely absurd as if nobody ever checked the primary sources. :/


Post edited/moved by: Artie, 21 Feb 2021, 12:49am
21 Feb 2021, 1:16am
Ah Artie finally decided to move the discussion xD
21 Feb 2021, 5:54am
Igneel PrimeCountries where boomers (more the "ok boomer" boomers than generally the age group) have a lot of influence aren't exactly likely to have good internet because a large or at least influential part of the population cares more about its retirement than making progress.


This was simmering in the back of my mind the many hours I was playing today.

I have to ask, merely curious, just how much if any of your retirement/pension are you willing to give up & donate to further the development of infrastructure improvement, now & in the future?

Igneel PrimeIt's also sheer populism. If there are a lot of such old idiots and someone wants to get elected they're gonna promise improvements for retired folks and not better digital infrastructure which most of them have no idea how to use anyway.


I did a search on the general percentage of those who voted over the years, as well as the percentage of those eligible to vote, yet didn't.

My results referenced voting & voters in the U.S. so it may not be representative for other countries & areas of the world.

I found a number of sites, but tried to use the 2 with the most current information.

This indicates that older & better-educated people tend to have a higher percentage who vote.

This indicates that in general, the number of youth actively voting compared to youth eligible but not voting has taken a nosedive over the years & due to that the age group remains under-represented.

So, it seems that those 'idiots' you mentioned weren't the older folks, but the younger ones!

One doesn't have to be of the current generation to know how to use & want better (interweb & cellphone) infrastructure... but we've worked hard for & earned our retirement &/ pension.

Every improvement is built upon the foundations of other improvements. Most of the things that you've come to enjoy & maybe even taken for granted were built & paid for by us older folks.

Don't cast dispersions on us older folks... & if the younger generations want more of a voice in gov't & the decisions being made, well that takes more than bitchin' & whinin' about it. It takes active participation in the process!

BUT... what I'm most interested in hearing about is your answer to the question I asked at the beginning!
21 Feb 2021, 6:16am
We're the ones paying your pensions over here. Just saying.

And infrastructure isn't upgraded with pension money but with the taxes we pay. That's what they're for.
21 Feb 2021, 7:16am
I guess over there, taxes are for paying pensions too.

Jus' sayin'...
21 Feb 2021, 7:25am
Nah, pensions get paid by the pensions contribution, which is more like a mandatory insurance.

Point being: money used for pensions and money used for infrastructure are entirely separate, so I wouldn't need to donate anything of my pension to upgrade infrastructure.
21 Feb 2021, 10:59am
You're right. Taking examples from the US is not exactly representative of any country in Europe and definitely not mine. To answer your question which I can already guess you won't like. It's about necessity. Not one person needs und 3 houses, 2 boats and 8k€ pension to live even a slightly above average life. And definitely not while others can't afford existing. That's not even made up is the sad part. Such people exist and if we're talking about giving someone 8k pension or capping pension at 3k and putting the rest in other things where they're more needed and useful my choice is clear. And because I already hear it coming "BuT tHoSe PeOpLe EaRnEd ThAt MoNeY". No. Other people should have earned more and didn't. Some people earn that much and certainly don't deserve it. The system needs to be reworked because it's broken and that starts at redistributing wealth as necessary. IF I actually earned that much I'd be more than willing to give up some of it so it may be used where it's more needed. Be that other people or the infrastructure.
21 Feb 2021, 11:12am
I know Synthya has me ignored, but I sincerely have to wonder if she's the type of person who complains that her tax dollars go toward the fire department putting out someone else's house.
21 Feb 2021, 11:36am
Vinh Kruczek..... I already chatted on that subject with Igneel in private due to how dangerously close to political discussion it is for INARA, especially when we take into account very weird medial coverage that sometimes puts stuff so bizarrely absurd as if nobody ever checked the primary sources. :/

Yeah, it will be good to not go into the politics stuff here. Although it is off topic and the thread seems to suitable for that, it usually isn't the best theme of discussions and polarized opinions with the related problems will inevitably appear, sooner or later.
21 Feb 2021, 11:42am
XeknosI know Synthya has me ignored, but I sincerely have to wonder if she's the type of person who complains that her tax dollars go toward the fire department putting out someone else's house.


That makes 2 of us

Post a reply

You must be signed in to post here.
Anything not directly and indirectly related to Elite:Dangerous, Starfield, Inara, galaxy and so on. Just please no politics, religion and similar usually heated discussions, please. It never ends well despite the best efforts...