JbshadowI've got question for the Salvage ships/Scavengers out there, what are the best types of signal sources to look for if I want to salvage commodities to sell legally and illegally?
JbshadowI've got question for the Salvage ships/Scavengers out there, what are the best types of signal sources to look for if I want to salvage commodities to sell legally and illegally?
...then again...if you can let a 1000 ton spaceship fly at 600c, i guess we have already a substantial amount of energy 
Tigon OlogdringMass === Mass
Weight = Mass x Gravity (in very simplistic terms)
Weight is what we feel, mass is what we is — the lower the gravity the lighter we feel. Which is why I think the Earth's gravity is getting stronger 'cos I sure feel heavier and we all know that curry and bacon rolls are slimming and so I should be feeling lighter...
....what i referring to was that if you increase mass, you increase gravity, and then i mean of the spacestation....it's not equal , but there is a corrolation....now your own weight is your mass x gravity exerted by the spacestation (increased with extra energy for extra mass)Luke3107Would just like to point out that while mass is a factor in gravitational pull, density is a much greater factor.
For example the star Betelgeuse is approximately 11.6 solar masses, and is estimated to be around 8.9AU in diameter (For reference, one Solar Mass is equal to the mass of Sol, and one AU is the distance from Earth to the Sun). This diameter means that, if you were to insert it into our own system in the place of our sun, it would extend beyond Jupiters orbit, but not quite as far as Saturns. However, the star itself, exerts very little in the way of gravitational pull. Relative to Earth, yes, its pull is immense. However observations of interstellar objects have shown that Betelgueses presence often has little to no impact on the direction such objects follow.
By comparison, a Neutron Star weighing a measly 1.5 Solar Masses, can affect such objects by a considerable amount and from quite far away. In fact, putting such an object in place of our own sun again, would cause Mercury and Venus to divert their orbits and collide with the star, with the possibility of Earth following suit.
You mention the space stations, which definitely have significant mass. However, it should be noted that much of their occupied space is taken up by air. That cavernous hangar bay for example. This basically means that in terms of density, the station is a balloon compared to many stellar bodies.
As for the math, I can see the logic behind your thinking. I'm not convinced it works like that however, as energy has no mass and therefore, increasing the energy of something shouldn't have an impact on said objects mass. But then, I'll say it before someone else does, I'm no expert...
...but.....in the case of your star-examples...the d2 already compensates for the diamter of your star-samples.... (for the non-read into, propulsion based on chance that something doesn't happen) 
)Draxxa Kireth[quote=Luke3107]Would just like to point out that while mass is a factor in gravitational pull, density is a much greater factor.
*snip*
Valid points...the main problem with my creative(!) theory is that you need to insert that energy into the mass....the question would then be...how much energy....and at the sametime not to raise the density too much ...but.....in the case of your star-examples...the d2 already compensates for the diamter of your star-samples....*snip*
Silver Tafferobviously I need to gravitate to a bar....the larger the drink, the stronger it's pull
...line them up is even better :pTigon OlogdringThe FSD must have some sort of gravitational/inertial effect, otherwise everyone would simply be pate. (which is like spreadable bacon)
