Elite: Game talk

20 Dec 2017, 5:25pm
Damon8r351
Draxxa Kireth
Damon8r351


Armed merchant cruisers were combat ships also. I wouldn't take one into the line of battle with me, but they do in the absence of something better. The Germans used them in the world wars as commerce raiders in the absence of more capable dedicated warships. They used the element of surprise because a merchant ship can't stand up in a sustained battle with a real warship. The aux cruiser Kormoran was even able to destroy an Australian light cruiser in a mutually destructive battle. The aux cruiser Pinguin managed to destroy or capture 137,000 tonnes worth of shipping. The British used armed merchant cruisers as anti-submarine warfare ships, and they also converted a number of bulk cargo ships and oil tankers into ad hoc aircraft carriers to support Atlantic materiel convoys.


Being able to spoof


Lol, great, Thank you, Silverback!!...Now we hope to fool the Thargoids

I wonder how cold these ships would be running actually



I made an observation early on, that the Type-10 would be a great Q-ship. Have an installable transmitter that spoofs a Type-9 indentification, when a pirate gets too close out come the big guns. Elite could use a good Q-ship.

Yet another observation I made was that it would make a good merchant aircraft carrier. Give it the ability to launch multiple NPC controlled fighters, especially AX Taipans, and it would make an interesting centerpiece to a wing.


I would love a proper carrier ship. I'd keep a mix of NPC and human pilots. Can any ship launch more than one fighter at present? It seems I can only keep one NPC pilot on my Anaconda despite having a double hangar with two fighters in it.
20 Dec 2017, 5:40pm
Calteru
Damon8r351
Draxxa Kireth
Damon8r351


Armed merchant cruisers were combat ships also. I wouldn't take one into the line of battle with me, but they do in the absence of something better. The Germans used them in the world wars as commerce raiders in the absence of more capable dedicated warships. They used the element of surprise because a merchant ship can't stand up in a sustained battle with a real warship. The aux cruiser Kormoran was even able to destroy an Australian light cruiser in a mutually destructive battle. The aux cruiser Pinguin managed to destroy or capture 137,000 tonnes worth of shipping. The British used armed merchant cruisers as anti-submarine warfare ships, and they also converted a number of bulk cargo ships and oil tankers into ad hoc aircraft carriers to support Atlantic materiel convoys.



Being able to spoof


Lol, great, Thank you, Silverback!!...Now we hope to fool the Thargoids

I wonder how cold these ships would be running actually




I made an observation early on, that the Type-10 would be a great Q-ship. Have an installable transmitter that spoofs a Type-9 indentification, when a pirate gets too close out come the big guns. Elite could use a good Q-ship.

Yet another observation I made was that it would make a good merchant aircraft carrier. Give it the ability to launch multiple NPC controlled fighters, especially AX Taipans, and it would make an interesting centerpiece to a wing.



I would love a proper carrier ship. I'd keep a mix of NPC and human pilots. Can any ship launch more than one fighter at present? It seems I can only keep one NPC pilot on my Anaconda despite having a double hangar with two fighters in it.


Just one NPC and one human multi-crew member at this point. Which is supported by the class 6 and 7 hangar bays.
20 Dec 2017, 6:05pm
Oh the year was 1778,

How I wish I was in Sherbooke now.

When a Letter of Marque came from the King,
to the scummiest vessel I'd ever seen.

--- damn them all,
I was told,
We'd cruise the seas for American Gold.
We'd fire no guns, shed no tears,
Now I'm a broken man on a Halifax pier, the last of Barrett's Privateers.


Oh Elcid Barrett cried the town,

How I wish I was in Sherbrooke now.

For 20 brave men, all fishermen who
Would make for him The Antelope's crew.

--- damn them all,
I was told,
We'd cruise the seas for American Gold.
We'd fire no guns, shed no tears,
Now I'm a broken man on a Halifax pier, the last of Barrett's Privateers.


The Antelope sloop was a sickening sight.

How I wish I was in Sherbrooke now.

She'd a list to the port and her sails in rags,
and the cook in the scuppers with the staggers and jags.

--- damn them all,
I was told,
We'd cruise the seas for American Gold.
We'd fire no guns, shed no tears,
Now I'm a broken man on a Halifax pier, the last of Barrett's Privateers.


On the King's birthday we put to sea,

How I wish I was in Sherbrooke now.

We were 91 days to Montego Bay,
pumping like madmen all the way.

--- damn them all,
I was told,
We'd cruise the seas for American Gold.
We'd fire no guns, shed no tears,
Now I'm a broken man on a Halifax pier, the last of Barrett's Privateers.


On the 96th day we sailed again.

How I wish I was in Sherbrooke now.

When a bloody great Yankee hove in sight,
with our cracked four-pounders we made to fight.

--- damn them all,
I was told,
We'd cruise the seas for American Gold.
We'd fire no guns, shed no tears,
Now I'm a broken man on a Halifax pier, the last of Barrett's Privateers.


Now the Yankee lay down low with gold,

How I wish I was in Sherbrooke now.

She was broad and fat and loose in stays,
but to catch her took the Antelope two whole days.

--- damn them all,
I was told,
We'd cruise the seas for American Gold.
We'd fire no guns, shed no tears,
Now I'm a broken man on a Halifax pier, the last of Barrett's Privateers.


Then at length we stood two cables away,

How I wish I was in Sherbrooke now.

Our cracked four-pounders made an awful din,
but with one fat ball the Yank stove us in.

--- damn them all,
I was told,
We'd cruise the seas for American Gold.
We'd fire no guns, shed no tears,
Now I'm a broken man on a Halifax pier, the last of Barrett's Privateers.


The Antelope shook and pitched on her side.

How I wish I was in Sherbrooke now.

Barrett was smashed like a bowl of eggs,
and the main truck carried off both me legs.

--- damn them all,
I was told,
We'd cruise the seas for American Gold.
We'd fire no guns, shed no tears,
Now I'm a broken man on a Halifax pier, the last of Barrett's Privateers.


Here I lay in my 23rd year,

How I wish I was in Sherbrooke now.

It's been six years since we sailed away,
but I just made Halifax yesterday.

--- damn them all,
I was told,
We'd cruise the seas for American Gold.
We'd fire no guns, shed no tears,
Now I'm a broken man on a Halifax pier, the last of Barrett's Privateers.


- Stan Rogers, Barrett's Privateers

The use of merchant vessels in times of war is a practice nearly as old as war itself. so this really is a natural kind of progression. We've seen our largest warships fall to alien aggression. We've seen stations stand defenseless, so this move makes perfect sense. We need ships, large and strong, but still small enough for our defensive systems to protect to stand against these aliens.
20 Dec 2017, 6:11pm
@IndigoWyrd hahaha, greate!...that makes Elite even more fun..al the knowledge here...and i should thank Damon8r also!
20 Dec 2017, 6:31pm
IndigoWyrd
The use of merchant vessels in times of war is a practice nearly as old as war itself. so this really is a natural kind of progression. We've seen our largest warships fall to alien aggression. We've seen stations stand defenseless, so this move makes perfect sense. We need ships, large and strong, but still small enough for our defensive systems to protect to stand against these aliens.


But merchant vessels are usually not strong in a military sense and usually they're not build specifically to use in a battle. There's simply no sense in building a civilian vessel as template to slap some military modifications on later. If you have the capacity to do that, you also have the capacity to build warships.
20 Dec 2017, 6:36pm
When military sci fi mixes with the Golden Age of sail is my most favoritest thing ever, which is why I'm a big fan of the Honor Harrington novels. I'm almost tempted to save up for a Type-10, load it up with a fighter hangar and as much armor as it can hold, and name her the HMAMC Wayfarer.
20 Dec 2017, 6:56pm
Rebecca Hail
IndigoWyrd
The use of merchant vessels in times of war is a practice nearly as old as war itself. so this really is a natural kind of progression. We've seen our largest warships fall to alien aggression. We've seen stations stand defenseless, so this move makes perfect sense. We need ships, large and strong, but still small enough for our defensive systems to protect to stand against these aliens.



But merchant vessels are usually not strong in a military sense and usually they're not build specifically to use in a battle. There's simply no sense in building a civilian vessel as template to slap some military modifications on later. If you have the capacity to do that, you also have the capacity to build warships.


Yet it's a technique used multiple times throughout history. The Germans did it WW2 because while they did have the shipyards to build warships, their build capability was neutered by the Treaty of Versailles and they couldn't just pull a new surface fleet out of their butt. Plus also Hitler had a noted disdain for the German surface navy, and the Germans had scuttled most of their leftover WWI surface navy in Scapa Flow after that war. They were also trying to be deliberately sneaky. The German surface navy toward the beginning of the war was literally only the Tirpitz and the Bismarck, the Scharnhorst and the Gneisenau, a couple of pocket battleships, a handful of cruisers, a small flotilla of destroyers, and a hulk they thought about turning into an aircraft carrier. That's why the Allies were deathly afraid of the Germans getting a hold of France's surface navy after they surrendered.

The British did it because they had to be everywhere at once for awhile, and the Royal Navy was only so big at the start of the war. You take a warship off the frontline to defend the rear and the supply chain from submarines, and that's one less warship you have to sink an enemy battleship.

Merchantman conversions are usually stop-gap solutions until a more dedicated combat solution can catch up. You take a pre-existing ship and try to hammer in equipment to perform a certain mission until a better solution can catch up. In my head canon, Type-10s are built from the ground up, but they also being converted from pre-existing Type-9s in a process akin to jumboization.
20 Dec 2017, 6:59pm
Rebecca Hail
IndigoWyrd
The use of merchant vessels in times of war is a practice nearly as old as war itself. so this really is a natural kind of progression. We've seen our largest warships fall to alien aggression. We've seen stations stand defenseless, so this move makes perfect sense. We need ships, large and strong, but still small enough for our defensive systems to protect to stand against these aliens.



But merchant vessels are usually not strong in a military sense and usually they're not build specifically to use in a battle. There's simply no sense in building a civilian vessel as template to slap some military modifications on later. If you have the capacity to do that, you also have the capacity to build warships.


It takes much longer to construct an entirely new hull than to refit an existing one.

In the days of wooden sailing ships, merchant ships refit as warships would often have armor bolted over the hull and additional timbers added internally to reinforce the hull. Far more existing ships could be refit this way faster than a single dedicated warship could be constructed, and was often done while warships were being built in the shipyards, to maintain naval strength.

We know there are at least two more ships coming next year - the Chieftan and the Krait. Should we have simply waited? Personally, I love the 'improvised' idea. And remember, the Type-10 is not just a simple refit either - it was simply used as base. "Utilising a reinforced Type-9 chassis as a starting point, Lakon overhauled and geared every aspect of the design for combat, producing a military behemoth that could be produced in volume at short notice."

The most important parts to note here are highlighted red. Also, keep in mind that until this point The Alliance has had no ships - still has no unique ships, their navy consisting of ships from neutral shipyards and defector pilots who brought their own navy craft with them. The Alliance has long been the power of idealists, philosophers and and those seeking an alternative to the more militaristic powers of the Federation and the Empire.

Now they're taking their first real steps towards militarization so they have to start somewhere.

We may yet see other ship manufacturers step up as well - Gutamaya, Core Dynamics, Zorgon Peterson, Falcon-deLacey, even Saud Kruger could potentially enter the fight. Some of these, like Gutamaya, Core Dynamics and Falcon-deLacey will have an easier time, as they have traditionally constructed ships meant to engage in combat. Zorgon and Saud might have a tougher time, as they do not (with the exception of the cooperative venture that is the Fer de Lance).

From a real-world perspective, let's look at the Humvee - a classic military-designed vehicle, but it was not the only contender for this particular role.

Lamborghini also competed for military contracts. Their first model, the Cheetah was built in 1977.



This was replaced by the LM001 in 1981:



And finally by the LM002 in 1982



In the end, AM General won out with their High-Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV, or Humvee):



Lamborghini proved to be more expensive and a bit less adept at performing under combat conditions.
20 Dec 2017, 7:08pm
IndigoWyrdsnip


I agree with all that. Plus I'd like to point out that it wouldn't be all that difficult to convert Type-9s to Type-10s, from a lore standpoint. 21st century technology has the ability to saw a bulk carrier in half, add in a hundred foot hull section, and weld it back together into a seaworthy condition. I'd imagine by 3303, we'd have the ability to tear down a pre-existing spacecraft to parade rest and rebuild it with a stronger hull and weapon mounts and make it cheaper than buying a new Anaconda off the shelf.

I can easily imagine the Alliance coming to Lakon, saying "Here's our massive merchant marine complement of Type-9s, make them into something resembling a warship till we can design our own warships."
20 Dec 2017, 7:21pm
I am loving this discussion right now.
20 Dec 2017, 7:32pm
By now this actually belongs actually to the Lore -thread...but definately entertaining and interesting to read!
20 Dec 2017, 7:38pm
IndigoWyrd
It takes much longer to construct an entirely new hull than to refit an existing one.

In the days of wooden sailing ships, merchant ships refit as warships would often have armor bolted over the hull and additional timbers added internally to reinforce the hull. Far more existing ships could be refit this way faster than a single dedicated warship could be constructed, and was often done while warships were being built in the shipyards, to maintain naval strength.

We know there are at least two more ships coming next year - the Chieftan and the Krait. Should we have simply waited? Personally, I love the 'improvised' idea. And remember, the Type-10 is not just a simple refit either - it was simply used as base. "Utilising a reinforced Type-9 chassis as a starting point, Lakon overhauled and geared every aspect of the design for combat, producing a military behemoth that could be produced in volume at short notice."

The most important parts to note here are highlighted red. Also, keep in mind that until this point The Alliance has had no ships - still has no unique ships, their navy consisting of ships from neutral shipyards and defector pilots who brought their own navy craft with them. The Alliance has long been the power of idealists, philosophers and and those seeking an alternative to the more militaristic powers of the Federation and the Empire.

Now they're taking their first real steps towards militarization so they have to start somewhere.

We may yet see other ship manufacturers step up as well - Gutamaya, Core Dynamics, Zorgon Peterson, Falcon-deLacey, even Saud Kruger could potentially enter the fight. Some of these, like Gutamaya, Core Dynamics and Falcon-deLacey will have an easier time, as they have traditionally constructed ships meant to engage in combat. Zorgon and Saud might have a tougher time, as they do not (with the exception of the cooperative venture that is the Fer de Lance).


It takes more time to construct the hull with the current level of technology. We actually don't know how long you need to construct a new hull in the ED universe. That the T10 are refitted T9s and not constructed with new T9 hulls (which have to be modified too, as the T10 has more thrusters, more hardpoints, etc), is speculation.

Now consider the enemy they're supposed to hold up against.

From what I've seen so far, the T-10 is a mediocre combat ship at best. Bad hard point placement, a huge hull, mediocre speed, let alone distributor size, jump range and turning speed.

If you go from a lore PoV, where the Thargoids ripped apart an entire federal fleet with ease, a fleet which consisted of combat oriented and optimized ships (not even considering the Farragut), those T10 will be ripped apart even easier, too. They might win with overwhelming numbers and huge numbers of casualties on the own side, but that's not something that's sustainable, not even for the 'short' time until Krait and Chieftain are supposed to replace them. Manpower and trained pilots are still valuable in 3304.

And that's not considering a potential conflict with another human military force. The T10 would simply not been able to stand up to those, unless the enemy is massively outnumbered.

I can see it's place as a capable supportship, but the backbone of the navy doesn't consist of support ships. If they really start to militarize, they need vessels more capable of combat then that monstrosity they produced there.
20 Dec 2017, 7:41pm
Is there a support role in combat here?
20 Dec 2017, 7:43pm
Lorewise and against the Thargoids it makes sense to a degree. With SLF, repair drones, healy beams, long range modded weapons, etc.

The only thing missing for a 'true' support would be an ammo drop.
20 Dec 2017, 7:47pm
CalteruIs there a support role in combat here?


Generally speaking? Yes. Healer/tanks come to mind.

Post a reply

You must be signed in to post here.
Elite:Dangerous related questions, answers, tips and help. Simply anything that is directly related to the game and its gameplay goes here.
For the discussions about the community, other stuff related to the game like astrophysics and so on please use the General talk thread.

What does belong here:
  • Questions, answers, tips and guides about ship loadouts, game activities like exploration, mining, combat and similar things that directly relate to the gameplay.
  • Game technical issues and problems, if you are looking for a help. For the bug reports please head to the official FD forum.
  • Discussion about "official" events from GalNet and community goals.
What does not belong here:
  • Discussing player actions and activities, general topics about Elite community and player events, topics related to the game but also real world (like astrophysics and similar). Please post these to the "General talk" thread instead.
  • Any off topic discussion, please post this kind of stuff to the "Offtopic" thread.