Elite: Game talk

01 Dec 2020, 6:42pm
Amata Lirein
Rebecca Hail
Amata Lirein



Like I said: The Fednecks are rather quick at applying military pressure when things don't go their way the first time. Achenar rejecting to join the Federation? SEND AN EXPEDITIONARY FLEET! Settlers don't want to sell their land to the corporations? BIRTHRIGHT WARS!

The trackrecord of the Federation with these kind of things isn't the best...




Claiming that the conflict between the Empire and the Federation was caused by Corporations is flat out false.



I haven't said that. I said that the Feds response to the rejection of an offer is usually military action, be it on orders of the government (Achenar) or the corporations (Birthright Wars).


Ah, sry, I misread that. Still a misrepresentation of the situation and not comparable to Core Dynamics wanting to merge with Lakon. ^^

I, on the other hand, remember the Empire trying to invade a system controlled by the Federation for their own internal reasons not too long ago. One could subsequently say that the same goes for the Empire.
01 Dec 2020, 6:49pm
Rebecca Hail
Amata Lirein
Rebecca Hail



Claiming that the conflict between the Empire and the Federation was caused by Corporations is flat out false.




I haven't said that. I said that the Feds response to the rejection of an offer is usually military action, be it on orders of the government (Achenar) or the corporations (Birthright Wars).



Ah, sry, I misread that. Still a misrepresentation of the situation and not comparable to Core Dynamics wanting to merge with Lakon. ^^

I, on the other hand, remember the Empire trying to invade a system controlled by the Federation for their own internal reasons not too long ago. One could subsequently say that the same goes for the Empire.


That case had one major difference though: The Empire had hard evidence that the NMLA is operating out of that system, but the Federation outright refused to either cooperate or investigate on their own. Only afterwards they did some digging on orders of the Vice President, and as the bomb making facility in said system has not been shut down the Federation payed dearly for their arrogance with a bombed station.
01 Dec 2020, 7:09pm
Amata Lirein
Rebecca Hail
Amata Lirein



I haven't said that. I said that the Feds response to the rejection of an offer is usually military action, be it on orders of the government (Achenar) or the corporations (Birthright Wars).




Ah, sry, I misread that. Still a misrepresentation of the situation and not comparable to Core Dynamics wanting to merge with Lakon. ^^

I, on the other hand, remember the Empire trying to invade a system controlled by the Federation for their own internal reasons not too long ago. One could subsequently say that the same goes for the Empire.



That case had one major difference though: The Empire had hard evidence that the NMLA is operating out of that system, but the Federation outright refused to either cooperate or investigate on their own. Only afterwards they did some digging on orders of the Vice President, and as the bomb making facility in said system has not been shut down the Federation payed dearly for their arrogance with a bombed station.


What the Empires intentions were is completely irrelevant. It dispatched forces into a federal system without prior permission to do so by the Federation itself. That the Federation defends its territory in response isn't just natural, it is expected. As a state you can't ignore any incursions, much less another state arresting citizens on your territory, especially not from a major power that is your declared rival. That incident alone reminds me a lot of the start of WW1.

Had the Empire wanted to cooperate, it would've either asked for permission to dispatch investigators into the system or it would've shared the intelligence it had concerning the bomb making sites. It did not and decided to provoke the Federation into a conflict instead.

If anyone is at fault for thousands of dead federal citizens here, it's the Empire by acting in the way they did and not even attempting to cooperate.

The funny thing about this is (and that's why I don't believe that there'll be an imperial-federal war at the end of this story arch) that due to how the events unfolded, Hudson is getting his popularity back. And ironically Hudson is the one who's more likely to do what the Empire wants (deporting the refugees back into the Empire) at the moment.
01 Dec 2020, 7:18pm
Rebecca HailHad the Empire wanted to cooperate, it would've either asked for permission to dispatch investigators into the system or it would've shared the intelligence it had concerning the bomb making sites. It did not and decided to provoke the Federation into a conflict instead.


That's wrong.

(...)A report from the Imperial Internal Security Service stated:

“With information provided by the engineer Liz Ryder, we located an abandoned workshop where explosives had been constructed using her blueprints. Traces were found of Thargoid caustic enzymes, matching the payloads delivered during the starport bombings.”

“Micro-signage on cargo containers identified bulk deliveries of equipment from a Federal system in neutral space, where we believe the NMLA has a second bomb-making facility. IISS agents are currently investigating to confirm these findings.”

The Empire made their evidence PUBLIC for all to see. The Federal response?

Federal Ambassador Jordan Rochester refuted these allegations:

“The suggestion that we’re responsible for the Empire’s home-grown extremists is laughable. As with their persecution of Marlinists, this is another excuse for an inability to solve their own problems.”(...)

Source

And no, nothing was left out from these excerpts.


The Federation outright dismissed the very idea that the NMLA could get support from somewhere inside the Federation despite the Empire making their evidence public.
01 Dec 2020, 7:34pm
Amata Lirein
Rebecca HailHad the Empire wanted to cooperate, it would've either asked for permission to dispatch investigators into the system or it would've shared the intelligence it had concerning the bomb making sites. It did not and decided to provoke the Federation into a conflict instead.



That's wrong.

(...)A report from the Imperial Internal Security Service stated:

“With information provided by the engineer Liz Ryder, we located an abandoned workshop where explosives had been constructed using her blueprints. Traces were found of Thargoid caustic enzymes, matching the payloads delivered during the starport bombings.”

“Micro-signage on cargo containers identified bulk deliveries of equipment from a Federal system in neutral space, where we believe the NMLA has a second bomb-making facility. IISS agents are currently investigating to confirm these findings.”



The Empire made their evidence PUBLIC for all to see. The Federal response?

Federal Ambassador Jordan Rochester refuted these allegations:

“The suggestion that we’re responsible for the Empire’s home-grown extremists is laughable. As with their persecution of Marlinists, this is another excuse for an inability to solve their own problems.”(...)

Source

And no, nothing was left out from these excerpts.



The Federation outright dismissed the very idea that the NMLA could get support from somewhere inside the Federation despite the Empire making their evidence public.


No, it didn't. The Federation suggested that it is laughable that the Federation itself supported the NMLA, not that someone inside the Federation does. Rochester represents the federal government and communicates their official stance. Especially since the Imperial Ambassador refers to rumors about support from the Federation itself for the NMLA in the very same news article.

But that's irrelevant too, since that's a) not sharing intelligence since that does not happen over public channels, b) micro-signages on cargo containers of bulk deliveries of unspecified equipment are pretty thin evidence and c) there's no indication that the Empire received permission to dispatch forces or investigators into the Federation.

Again, the Federation defending its territory is natural and expected and the Empire knew that when it decided to attempt to occupy a federal system. Had the Empire instead decided to just dispatch their intelligence services, the Federation might have just pretended that nothing happened.

Of course it is pure coincidence that the Empire tries to occupy a system that holds many Marlinists refugees, which they want deported back to the Empire, by force. Obviously it would've been just for the sake of the investigation into the NMLA and none of the refugees would've been forced to go back to the Empire.

Whether you want to admit it or not, the Federation isn't in the wrong here. ^^
01 Dec 2020, 7:35pm
Thanks all....I should have seen that lol...
01 Dec 2020, 7:45pm
Rebecca Hail
Amata Lirein
Rebecca HailHad the Empire wanted to cooperate, it would've either asked for permission to dispatch investigators into the system or it would've shared the intelligence it had concerning the bomb making sites. It did not and decided to provoke the Federation into a conflict instead.




That's wrong.

(...)A report from the Imperial Internal Security Service stated:

“With information provided by the engineer Liz Ryder, we located an abandoned workshop where explosives had been constructed using her blueprints. Traces were found of Thargoid caustic enzymes, matching the payloads delivered during the starport bombings.”

“Micro-signage on cargo containers identified bulk deliveries of equipment from a Federal system in neutral space, where we believe the NMLA has a second bomb-making facility. IISS agents are currently investigating to confirm these findings.”




The Empire made their evidence PUBLIC for all to see. The Federal response?

Federal Ambassador Jordan Rochester refuted these allegations:

“The suggestion that we’re responsible for the Empire’s home-grown extremists is laughable. As with their persecution of Marlinists, this is another excuse for an inability to solve their own problems.”(...)

Source

And no, nothing was left out from these excerpts.




The Federation outright dismissed the very idea that the NMLA could get support from somewhere inside the Federation despite the Empire making their evidence public.



No, it didn't. The Federation suggested that it is laughable that the Federation itself supported the NMLA, not that someone inside the Federation does. Rochester represents the federal government and communicates their official stance. Especially since the Imperial Ambassador refers to rumors about support from the Federation itself for the NMLA in the very same news article.

But that's irrelevant too, since that's a) not sharing intelligence since that does not happen over public channels, b) micro-signages on cargo containers of bulk deliveries of unspecified equipment are pretty thin evidence and c) there's no indication that the Empire received permission to dispatch forces or investigators into the Federation.

Again, the Federation defending is natural and expected and the Empire knew that when it decided to attempt to occupy a federal system. Had the Empire instead decided to just dispatch their intelligence services, the Federation might have just pretended that nothing happened. Of course it is pure coincidence that the Empire tries to occupy a system that holds many Marlinists refugees, which they want deported back to the Empire, by force. Obviously it would've been just for the sake of the investigation into the NMLA and none of the refugees would've forced to go back to the Empire.

Whether you want to admit it or not, the Federation isn't in the wrong here. ^^


But the IISS never SAID that the Federation was involved directly, only that the NMLA got support from INSIDE the Federation. Big difference. Rochester just twisted it into an accusation by the Empire against the Federation itself. Also the attempt to conquer the system was only made after the local authorities began to fight the Imperial investigators, occupation of that system was originally not planned and was only deemed necessary once their investigators got fired upon.

The Empire’s counter-terrorism operation in the LTT 1935 system has triggered armed resistance from the Federation.

The Imperial Internal Security Service’s investigation into the NMLA terrorist group led its agents to LTT 1935, a Federation-controlled system in neutral space. Military vessels were called in for support, only to be met in combat by Federal forces.

Source


As this article points out: The Imperial Navy got only called in after the IISS got attacked by Federal armed forces.
01 Dec 2020, 7:57pm
Rebecca Hail
Amata Lirein
Rebecca Hail



Claiming that the conflict between the Empire and the Federation was caused by Corporations is flat out false.




I haven't said that. I said that the Feds response to the rejection of an offer is usually military action, be it on orders of the government (Achenar) or the corporations (Birthright Wars).



Ah, sry, I misread that. Still a misrepresentation of the situation and not comparable to Core Dynamics wanting to merge with Lakon. ^^

I, on the other hand, remember the Empire trying to invade a system controlled by the Federation for their own internal reasons not too long ago. One could subsequently say that the same goes for the Empire.


If a whole pot full of terrorist blew up some of your stations and then fled to hide in another juris would you not want to invade and kill them? I know I would, and well in RL have.
01 Dec 2020, 8:00pm
Amata Lirein
Rebecca Hail
No, it didn't. The Federation suggested that it is laughable that the Federation itself supported the NMLA, not that someone inside the Federation does. Rochester represents the federal government and communicates their official stance. Especially since the Imperial Ambassador refers to rumors about support from the Federation itself for the NMLA in the very same news article.

But that's irrelevant too, since that's a) not sharing intelligence since that does not happen over public channels, b) micro-signages on cargo containers of bulk deliveries of unspecified equipment are pretty thin evidence and c) there's no indication that the Empire received permission to dispatch forces or investigators into the Federation.

Again, the Federation defending is natural and expected and the Empire knew that when it decided to attempt to occupy a federal system. Had the Empire instead decided to just dispatch their intelligence services, the Federation might have just pretended that nothing happened. Of course it is pure coincidence that the Empire tries to occupy a system that holds many Marlinists refugees, which they want deported back to the Empire, by force. Obviously it would've been just for the sake of the investigation into the NMLA and none of the refugees would've forced to go back to the Empire.

Whether you want to admit it or not, the Federation isn't in the wrong here. ^^



But the IISS never SAID that the Federation was involved directly, only that the NMLA got support from INSIDE the Federation. Big difference. Rochester just twisted it into an accusation by the Empire against the Federation itself. Also the attempt to conquer the system was only made after the local authorities began to fight the Imperial investigators, occupation of that system was originally not planned and was only deemed necessary once their investigators got fired upon.


The title of the article is literally "Federation accused of supporting the NMLA". Assuming that GalNet as official lore source is at least halfways unbiased to either side, that means that there was an accusation even if it's not directly described inside the article.

That would fit to the remarks made by the imperial ambassador, so no, it's not Rochester twisting words.


The Empire’s counter-terrorism operation in the LTT 1935 system has triggered armed resistance from the Federation.

The Imperial Internal Security Service’s investigation into the NMLA terrorist group led its agents to LTT 1935, a Federation-controlled system in neutral space. Military vessels were called in for support, only to be met in combat by Federal forces.

Source



As this article points out: The Imperial Navy got only called in after the IISS got attacked by Federal armed forces.



There's no indication of this anywhere in the article. What it say is that the called "military support vessels" were met in combat, not that the investigators were attacked.

"The Imperial Internal Security Service’s investigation into the NMLA terrorist group led its agents to LTT 1935, a Federation-controlled system in neutral space. Military vessels were called in for support, only to be met in combat by Federal forces."

No mention of any investigators being attacked, nor is there a mention of why "military support vessels" were called in.

Again, it is natural and expected that a state defends its territory against external incursions. Imperial military has simply no business inside a federal system unless they are invited or at war. Neither was the case here.

Additionally to that the system hosts many refugees from the Empire, which are under the protection of the Federation. Obviously the Federation doesn't allow an occupation of the system.
01 Dec 2020, 8:06pm
Anyone having any issues since the last update? I am getting massive frame spikes out of the blue and that was never an issue.
01 Dec 2020, 8:10pm
Read that article again...

The Empire’s counter-terrorism operation in the LTT 1935 system has triggered armed resistance from the Federation.


This happened FIRST.

The Imperial Internal Security Service’s investigation into the NMLA terrorist group led its agents to LTT 1935, a Federation-controlled system in neutral space.


Here Galnet elaborates why the IISS was in that system in the first place.

Military vessels were called in for support,(...)


IISS called in the military for protection after meeting said "armed resistance"...

(...)only to be met in combat by Federal forces.


...which then led to the CG.

Also:

I stand by my statement that the IISS never accused the Federation itself. Galnet's headline was referring to the Imperial Ambassador's (admittingly heated and ill advised) response to Rochester's (equally ill advised) rebuttal of the IISS's claims that the trail led into Federal space (which it did).
01 Dec 2020, 8:20pm
Amata LireinRead that article again...

The Empire’s counter-terrorism operation in the LTT 1935 system has triggered armed resistance from the Federation.



This happened FIRST.

The Imperial Internal Security Service’s investigation into the NMLA terrorist group led its agents to LTT 1935, a Federation-controlled system in neutral space.



Here Galnet elaborates why the IISS was in that system in the first place.

Military vessels were called in for support,(...)



IISS called in the military for protection after meeting said "armed resistance"...

(...)only to be met in combat by Federal forces.



...which then led to the CG.


This sentence:
The Empire’s counter-terrorism operation in the LTT 1935 system has triggered armed resistance from the Federation.

isn't part of the description, that is the overarching summary of the article.

This kind of one-sentence summary at the very beginning is a recurring thing through almost all galnet articles.


Also:

I stand by my statement that the IISS never accused the Federation itself. Galnet's headline was referring to the Imperial Ambassador's (admittingly heated and ill advised) response to Rochester's (equally ill advised) rebuttal of the IISS's claims that the trail led into Federal space (which it did).


I made pretty clear why I don't believe that. We're both biased for the respective superpower we're simping for, but in the end it's something that gets lost in the way FDev delivers the story. Imo, GalNet as official lore source is unbiased enough to not pull such a headline when it didn't actually happened. It's not some tabloid aiming for sensationalist news after all.
01 Dec 2020, 8:35pm
I am sure Aleks is preparing the mud wrestling ring for you two
01 Dec 2020, 8:36pm
EpisparhI am sure Aleks is preparing the mud wrestling ring for you two


Not really mud slinging lol.

Or well, I don't perceive it as such at least.

Just a friendly ... uhm, disagreement amongst dear enemies.
01 Dec 2020, 8:46pm
Yeah, it's just some "friendly" banter *points at the video that got moved into offtopic again*

Post a reply

You must be signed in to post here.
Elite:Dangerous related questions, answers, tips and help. Simply anything that is directly related to the game and its gameplay goes here.
For the discussions about the community, other stuff related to the game like astrophysics and so on please use the General talk thread.

What does belong here:
  • Questions, answers, tips and guides about ship loadouts, game activities like exploration, mining, combat and similar things that directly relate to the gameplay.
  • Game technical issues and problems, if you are looking for a help. For the bug reports please head to the official FD forum.
  • Discussion about "official" events from GalNet and community goals.
What does not belong here:
  • Discussing player actions and activities, general topics about Elite community and player events, topics related to the game but also real world (like astrophysics and similar). Please post these to the "General talk" thread instead.
  • Any off topic discussion, please post this kind of stuff to the "Offtopic" thread.