Miner WillyMy Latest toy, the Vainglorious Heart
It's gilt-edged, glamorous and sleek by design
it's got its sharp edges, hidden inside
It's hard, unrestrained and it's totally cool
It teases and it pleases as you're cruising through the starlight
Over half a billion spent so far on her, and still more engineering to go, just because she's the prettiest boat in the shipyard.
Jawohl DuffalThinder, you are trying to dissuade. The case here is false advertising not ships per say.
Jawohl DuffalArtieSo you are complaining about something that was never an intention. Any regular ship you buy for credits is similarly useless.
Untrue or misleading information given to you to get you to buy something that's definition of false advertising to me that's exactly what ARX PMKII was. There was the intention to sell ARX so to say to make money...
Wraith(USMC)Advice please.
I spent quite a bit of time mining for some high end materials this week. I transferred them to my carrier instead of selling to myself. I jumped in the game today and much of the material I mined is gone. Nothing is set to sell in the carrier. Is there something I've done wrong?
MeowersHells... Using premium synths on a single PvE bot schmuck and validating something through it?
MeowersHells... Using premium synths on a single PvE bot schmuck and validating something through it?
ThinderJawohl DuffalThinder, you are trying to dissuade. The case here is false advertising not ships per say.
I'm making a valid point, if they did indeed advertise the Python MK II as superior is wasn't a false claim.
ArtieJawohl DuffalArtieSo you are complaining about something that was never an intention. Any regular ship you buy for credits is similarly useless.
Untrue or misleading information given to you to get you to buy something that's definition of false advertising to me that's exactly what ARX PMKII was. There was the intention to sell ARX so to say to make money...
You are reacting to something completely different (the "problem" that the loadouts for the ships bought for ARX are basic). Either way, although I am not sure if the claim "Python Mk II is a superior combat ship" was actually made by FDev (as far as I remember they wanted to position it to compete with the PvP ships by some of their streams, but I cannot dispute for certain they truly said the first), the constant spinning on: "They lied to us! Bad, bad Frontier!" during any even remotely related opportunity starts to be tiresome.
(And I will move this whole discussion into the Rant corner where it belongs later on.)
Jawohl Duffal
Thinder stay with the philosophy how to make the perfect ship with E grade units.
Initial release of PMKII for ARX is the classical case of false advertising. It was the first ARX ship which was heavily advertised by FD as a superior medium combat ship (unfounded performance claims).
Manufactured by Faulcon deLacy, the Python Mk II is a redesign of an iconic vessel. Reimagined as a combat ship that sacrifices internal space for increased manoeuvrability, firepower and defence. With six hardpoints, it can go head-to-head with larger ships, while its improved agility allows it to handle smaller vessels without having to rely on turret weapons. The redesigned hull offers superior management of overcharged Frame Shift Drives.
The Python Mk II has been designed for medium-size landing pads.
PYTHON MK II
Jawohl Duffal
Whatever, if FD is not fixing PMKII by this Xmas, I will file for false advertising in my domicile.
