Leif

Naoto S.Hi, it must be exhausting to deal with a lot of reports posted here and am sorry for adding another one but...
I am now out exploring a bit and noticed that star system page of HIP 18077 shows there are two stations in this system, but the fact is the outpost named "Idc Reaserch Base" is from HIP 18007, not HIP 18077.... just one wrong number and it's hard to spot.
I was looking for a way to edit the system and seems I can add/edit stations to systems, but not delete it.
There are a few stations that do not exist in star system pages I found so if there is a way to get rid of them, it would be nice to know.

Thanks for all of your efforts and am continually amazed by this web site.

Just keep on reporting wrongly placed stations here. There is no user-accessible delete feature to avoid trolls.

Artie

TuzoArtie, only just found the Auto promote feature which would certainly save doing the process individually. The only thing that puts me off using it is that it sweeps up inactive players also.

Would it be possible to add a third selection box to define online (Inara) activity (or default it to something like 21 days)?

Something will be added.

TuzoAny timescale for this Artie?

Tuzo

Artie

TuzoArtie, only just found the Auto promote feature which would certainly save doing the process individually. The only thing that puts me off using it is that it sweeps up inactive players also.
 Would it be possible to add a third selection box to define online (Inara) activity (or default it to something like 21 days)?

Something will be added.

Any timescale for this Artie?

DogwoodIvyMinor suggestion for the Cargo page under Cargo and Crafting. The current layout of the page is that materials and data are listed alphabetically in three categories: Raw, Manufactured, and Data. This is a really great way to navigate the list of materials... but I thought it might also be useful to be able to view my materials and data inventory on a single page with another level of grouping, where that second level of grouping was based on the groups of materials found at material traders e.g. Thermic, Capacitors, Shields, etc... With the current view I can see that I have 35 Military Supercapacitors, and that I have 0 Polymer Capacitors, but I can't see that both of these materials are within a single trading "row / group" at a material trader (i.e. they can be traded at a x3 ratio instead of a x6). ...

ZagmeisterWhile doing black market runs to Sol for unlocking the Dweller, I noticed that the item Muon Imager in not illegal in Sol system, although the market page states that it is. Should be fixed.

Toe4Thanks for the web site, it is an essential go to for elite dangerous . I play on Xbox and update my materials when planning engineering projects. When I complete a blue print, would it be possible to give me an option to automatically deduct the mats from my list? ( allowing me to adjust for number of rolls) Thanks for all the hard work. Toe4

NishacharaFor starters, awesome page...i really know how much work goes into that.
Anyway, i wanted to ask if its not too much work if you can add character statistics to the bottom of the comanders log front page. I like to check out that from time to time ( even ingame ) and it would be handy there XD

Misaniovent
Yes, that overview is useful. Unfortunately, the favorability evaluation is not consistent and despite requests, Frontier has not clarified exactly how it works — the running assumption is that it does not work correctly! Because of this inconsistency, the "fortification bonus applied" marker that you have is not always correct. Please view Maorsi as an example: this system is 8/17 yet has a favorable trigger and none of its exploited systems are contested.

With that said, contested systems are important to trigger calculations. Being able to see an overview of all populated systems within 15 LY of a control system is valuable for other reasons, too.

I would say that if a system is overlapped by multiple control systems, listing all of them would be helpful. If a system is contested, then it doesn't give priority to either contesting control system. If it's overlapped (shared) by two control systems from the same power, one of them does receive its income, but I do not believe there is any way to determine which without being in-game to look at CC figures.

Vortex-XIIIRequest:
add a 'hide ship' tag to the ship edit/ship details.
And a new category 'hidden fleet' under 'fleet and modules', so the ships with that tag are not shown on the fleet page and wing rosters, but on a separate page just visible to the CMDR.

For us ship and module hoarders out there ;-)
(I mostly do not use the inara API or log uploads - which are a brilliant feature! - due to it messing up the fleet display)

Artie To be honest, I am not very willing to add such specific functionality here as it is just a workaround of the game storage limits, has no other purpose and brings just unnecessary complications. You can re-order the ships to have the "storages" on the bottom, so it may be the solution instead?

Artie

DogwoodIvyMinor suggestion for the Cargo page under Cargo and Crafting. The current layout of the page is that materials and data are listed alphabetically in three categories: Raw, Manufactured, and Data. This is a really great way to navigate the list of materials... but I thought it might also be useful to be able to view my materials and data inventory on a single page with another level of grouping, where that second level of grouping was based on the groups of materials found at material traders e.g. Thermic, Capacitors, Shields, etc... With the current view I can see that I have 35 Military Supercapacitors, and that I have 0 Polymer Capacitors, but I can't see that both of these materials are within a single trading "row / group" at a material trader (i.e. they can be traded at a x3 ratio instead of a x6). ...

Thank you for the suggestion. I think I have some similar improvements that on my ToDo, so it will be added there at some point with it.