Inara updates, bug reports, requests
When you try to link your accounts, you may receive the http error 400 about expired tokens. It's an issue on Frontier's end that I cannot solve on Inara. Fortunately, the solution is simple - please give it a few days and it will start to work later (probably when the access token on their cAPI server expires). If the error 400 appeared later and it worked before, try to reauthenticate as said in the error message (may be just a regular reauth forced by Frontier). Alternatively, you can try to use the workaround below. If even that won't work, it's the problem described above.
Please vote for the issue on the official bug tracker: https://issues.frontierstore.net/issue-detail/21258
Possible workaround: Try to connect the account while you are in the game. It may work.
Game data and imports not available for console commanders and PC players with Legacy game version
Inara supports only the Live game version (so PC Horizons 4.0 and Odyssey) since game update 14, thus all the game data on the site and the commander data imports work only for those game versions.
26 May 2021, 11:31am
Snarky_oneDragoCubX
From what I can see, their provided screenshot seems to be from an unscanned system, or it's just their filters? In any case, since we're talking about a planetary port, they have to scan the planet it is on first before it would show up on their navigation panel.
The reason I'm saying this is that all our faction's existing planetary ports remain and none disappeared, so I can't imagine that they removed stations.
The "filters" are station only. And the locations searched for are not surface stations. I appreciate where you were trying to ensure it wasn't just my searching, but no. I'm not new here. Something is wrong, clearly.
EDSM lists the station Sarrantonio Relay in HIP 4392 as a planetary port, hence why I asked. Since Inara lists it as an outpost though, hard to tell which is false. I'll try and have a look myself if I find the time
26 May 2021, 1:06pm
ThinkingWithPortalsI can confirm now that Beck requires 20 of EACH KIND of data mat for the invite.
Will have his engineering pics + the next guy's pic soon.\
Beck's stuff
https://imgur.com/a/yoAZRtE
Uma Laszlo's stuff
https://imgur.com/a/wD2l98C
Thank you, too!
The engineers were updated.
26 May 2021, 3:02pm
I think it would be pretty handy to differ on a minor faction-page in the "Controlled Stations"-table between usual starports and Odyssey Settlements. At the moment they are mixed. It would be good to have a second table or datafield for this.
Sincerly
Conparator
(Hope this isn't a duplicate)
BTW:
Awesome work!
26 May 2021, 3:52pm
ConparatorHello Artie,
I think it would be pretty handy to differ on a minor faction-page in the "Controlled Stations"-table between usual starports and Odyssey Settlements. At the moment they are mixed. It would be good to have a second table or datafield for this.
Sincerly
Conparator
(Hope this isn't a duplicate)
BTW:
Awesome work!
By Odyssey Settlements, do you mean the new ones where you can walk into all the buildings and stuff? Since those are already being listed separately. The new added planetary ports (that use the old Horizons layout) aren't counted separately, but I'm not sure how easy it would even be to mark/separate those from the others. But Artie may have more info on that
26 May 2021, 4:01pm
26 May 2021, 4:07pm
ArtieYes, those are separated already - "Star ports" should contain stations accessible/dockable even in Horizons (orbital and surface star ports and outposts), "Settlements" just the Odyssey surface settlements in the star system listings. For the minor factions... I don't know if that's really needed and won't make the usage of this table less effective, as a general overview of all controlled assets? Should I do the same tabs as on the star system page overview? I am open to this change, so asking for opinions.
Given that you can already sort the list by starport type, I would personally prefer to keep it as a single list
26 May 2021, 4:38pm
ArtieYes, those are separated already - "Star ports" should contain stations accessible/dockable even in Horizons (orbital and surface star ports and outposts), "Settlements" just the Odyssey surface settlements in the star system listings. For the minor factions... I don't know if that's really needed and won't make the usage of this table less effective, as a general overview of all controlled assets? Should I do the same tabs as on the star system page overview? I am open to this change, so asking for opinions.
The settlements do have e.g. a commodity market and a mission board so it has kinda similar features like a usual starport (like in Horizons and base game).
I personal think it could be handy. But that does not mean that, as already shown, other people think that it would be handy too.
27 May 2021, 7:43am
Not sure if it is reported or if still in development but personal equipment loadouts do not update weapons' grade.
27 May 2021, 9:19am
EpisparhHey Artie,
Not sure if it is reported or if still in development but personal equipment loadouts do not update weapons' grade.
Yes, there was nothing in the journals about the grades and mods. But I've got an information that today's game patch also contains the journal improvements in regard of loadouts, so I will check it and improve the loadouts here on Inara as well.
27 May 2021, 10:58am
YlarielWhat is Elite V in ranks?
They added 5 more elite ranks in Odyssey, they are listed in Roman numerals.
27 May 2021, 11:38am
Ylarielhow do I get them?
I don't have Odyssey yet so can't tell you. People have gone direct to Elite V so I assume it's automatic once you've done a shed load of actions.
27 May 2021, 11:42am
27 May 2021, 12:10pm
- Maverick for grades 4, 5
- Artemis for grades 4, 5
- Dominator for grade 5
Also, I am interested in the weapon stats. All grades, all types, modded or not - the numbers are visible on the loadout screen.
Last edit: 27 May 2021, 4:34pm
Link to Inara Discord: https://discord.gg/qfkFWTr