CupcoDoes it also include Reactivation missions?

Artie

Broken MessHi @Artie, going back to the total asset number being wonky, I think I may have isolated the issue - thanks to the detailed analysis of the player journal (mission logs and also docking information) here on Inara... the asset figure again jumped by almost 200m within a specific 20 minute timeframe on the 21st without me actually doing anything at all in-game that made those kind of credits - turns out when this happened I applied 2-3 suit/weapon upgrades at one of the engineers (Yarden Bond) so the game seems to account for those (via exorbitant asset value increases). Thought I'd let you know not that there's much you can do about it

Thanks for the confirmation of my suspicion, it really seems the personal equipment is not counted towards the assets on buying them, but gets suddenly counted in on engineering. So let's see if the game update 10 will improve something tomorrow.

Artie What I am not sure about is if such faction needs to be an owner of the station for the missions being offered there (and it may need to be further added to the search conditions), but probably not.

TarinIn the Russian layout, the chart data gives out "extra characters"
p.s.Google Chrome

ArtiePlease jump into the Odyssey and import your journal after that, the stats should get back. Some of them aren't a part of the Horizons and its journal and that's why it was reset.

MeowersSpeaking of Anarchist in-game role... And how do it differ from various others that seem close to it.

Rebels - got it covered already. They do battle and sabotage wherever it needed to bring a riot to successful ending. Once victorious in one place, they go to another to do the similar stuff, or they cease to be Rebels, switching to more peaceful roles, building up a business or going to an exploration trip, etc. Anarchists can do the same, but with independent factions/systems having almost all the attention, they unlikely to help any of the superpowers. And they won't be less Anarchists if they're not waging any war at the moment: any actions of an Anarchist are aimed at undermining the influence of authorities or at least not allowing the authorities to benefit from such actions. Or it can be a deceptive benefit, such as helping a faction that is loyal to superpower with their attempt to kick another loyalists from the system, only to turn the table in the end.

Freedom Fighters. They seem to be "Lawful" characters in terms of alignment. I don't know though how Imperial can be a Freedom Fighter. But their ideas don't prohibit loyalty to any kind of superpower or any other authority, and they aim to fight slavery, inequalities, etc., and "fight" here stands for open combat, for political means, for business competition, every kind of opposing yourself to anything you see going against ideals of freedom. Anarchists, while worshipping freedom as the biggest blessing, see authorities as this freedom's worst enemy. Maybe corporations too, because they seem to be the main power on "local" level. Any other folks that like to impair others freedoms, are second priority.

Renegade - an easy case. Anarchists can be "renegades" from systems, superpowers, etc., once serving somewhere, then changing mind about that stuff. But not every Anarchist had that "service, disappointment, red pill" story, many of them emerged from lower social classes. And not every Renegade would choose following the ways of anarchy.

Now, Outlaw. Usually, Anarchists are "on the other side" of the law, but not because of being prolific criminals. While Outlaws do murder, robberies, smuggling, drug dealing, trafficking etc. Anarchists see possible ways to gain profit not only by ways of crime: they just don't bother about "defying the law" in some way or another, yet still some Anarchists follow a moral code, that keeps them "clean" in many occasions, again, not because of law, but because of their personal decisions.

Another present roles I see too far away from comparison.