Mac4Thanks again, Artie.

Under our Missing Components section, there is now the phrase "No components to exchange, alternative exchange possible." What's this alternative exchange about?

ArtieIt means that you can still get some exchange with material trader, just in much less favourable ratio. As it is generally rather a last resort for exchanges that you don't need to see all the time it's hidden by default, but you can view it by clicking the plus sign/button at the start of the row.

DocIncDie neue Seite hat mich sehr überrascht. Jedoch werde ich mich erst dran gewöhnen müssen, das alte Layout hat mir Persönlich besser gefallen.
Aber man muss mit der Zeit gehen und sollte nicht zu sehr an der Vergangenheit festhalten.
Freue mich über den frischeren Look nur muss man sich erst dran gewöhnen über die Leiste alles abzurufen.
Die alte Seite hatte ihren ganz eigenen Charme gehabt. Ich werde der neuen Seite ihre Chance geben eventuell ist sie ja viel besser oder auch nicht.
Ich werde in den nächsten Wochen nochmal ein Feedback absetzen und beobachten was die anderen Member von der Seite halten.

Danke für die Mühe die ihr euch gemacht habt, auch wenn wir etwas Undankbar erscheinen und erstmal etwas meckern mit der Zeit werden wir schon damit zurecht kommen.

MfG
A.E.K./DocInc

James HussarPlease don't remove/deprecate the Old Inara view. I appreciate it being an option - please keep it as one.

The new look just isn't working for me at all. More info in less space is always better for me, since I have it on a side screen and want things at a glance. Having to scroll around, change pages, etc, is an activity onto itself and detracts from Inara being a helper and makes it a focal point. I focus on Inara to participate in discussions, but during gameplay, the new look isn't as helpful as the old look.

James HussarPlease don't remove/deprecate the Old Inara view. I appreciate it being an option - please keep it as one.

The new look just isn't working for me at all. More info in less space is always better for me, since I have it on a side screen and want things at a glance. Having to scroll around, change pages, etc, is an activity onto itself and detracts from Inara being a helper and makes it a focal point. I focus on Inara to participate in discussions, but during gameplay, the new look isn't as helpful as the old look.

QuillmonkeyHey Artie,
Stupid question but where do I go now to look up squadron rosters (not my own)?

Ronaldo_ROArtie, HI.

First thing to say "I like the Inara´s new look" , it´s good change thigs sometimes

I Have one things to inform and one thing to request.

- I can't find the information about conflicts and the system list in the squad page. I use this a lot to control pmf and update the inf for these systems..
- If was possible and you have time off coruse, I request one thing in this page (list of system from PMF ) include the distance from my location to the system in the list.

And good work, Inara is the best tools for CMD on Elite today.

Fly Safe o7

Tharkon SW
This sums it up for me as well, at least at first glance, I can't do a full experience review at the moment because I am far from the bubble and most of the Inara functions I use are bubble-related. The new interface requires a lot more clicking to get to the same thing, with looking in between the clicks.
There used to be three menus, now there is only one. And some pages can't even be reached without first looking at, then hovering over the menu, waiting, looking and then clicking. And while waiting and looking might not seem like actions when you're literally doing them on the fly these are 5 separate actions to do while previously it only required the last two.

And I know from experience that it indeed won't be easy to keep both up because it doubles the maintenance, but perhaps you can integrate some of the old usefulness in the new design, which seems to have a lot of empty space.

Sadly I cannot do a full experience review of the new design

Artie

HuboI have a suggestion to not shrink My Favorite Star Systems (on the right side) when I am on the Star System page. There is nothing more on the right side, so it is not useful and almost every time I have to click Show More as the shrinked version is not the list of the most used ones.

Some people are having a ton of them for unknown reasons, so I needed to put some limit there to not break the layout. How many do you have? Maybe some adjustment will be still possible.

Light-HawkI think the new design has potential, especially for mobile platforms. It's just not there yet. One quality of life change I don't like is that when new messages are made here, yes the new style will show what discussion tab has the new messages, but it no longer highlights which messages are actually new. Sure it's obviously the most recent posts. But how far back? The one new post? The last 14 posts? I like the old style where it shows all the messages you haven't read being a different color.

Hubo
I have around 60 favourite star systems. But even, if I have 100, the layout is still the same, just the longer list on the right side.

FauconvHello,

it seems that filtering stations list with "frontline solution" does not work. All stations are always display. When I edit a station in inara, i can not edit "frontline solution" service.

Exemple : in FLOUSOP system, "bosh hangar" station does not have "fronline solution" service, but inara give this station like it have this service and i can not modify this service in station edit page.

Artie

FauconvHello,

it seems that filtering stations list with "frontline solution" does not work. All stations are always display. When I edit a station in inara, i can not edit "frontline solution" service.

Exemple : in FLOUSOP system, "bosh hangar" station does not have "fronline solution" service, but inara give this station like it have this service and i can not modify this service in station edit page.

Hello, it does work, but as almost all stations has this service present it looks like everything is listed. Are you sure that Bosch hangar has no Frontline solutions at all? Because even in your own journal record, the service is listed there. It may be some new bug with the journals after update 13 if it's truly not there.