Inara updates, bug reports, requests
When you try to link your accounts, you may receive the http error 400 about expired tokens. It's an issue on Frontier's end that I cannot solve on Inara. Fortunately, the solution is simple - please give it a few days and it will start to work later (probably when the access token on their cAPI server expires). If the error 400 appeared later and it worked before, try to reauthenticate as said in the error message (may be just a regular reauth forced by Frontier). Alternatively, you can try to use the workaround below. If even that won't work, it's the problem described above.
Please vote for the issue on the official bug tracker: https://issues.frontierstore.net/issue-detail/21258
Possible workaround: Try to connect the account while you are in the game. It may work.
Game data and imports not available for console commanders and PC players with Legacy game version
Inara supports only the Live game version (so PC Horizons 4.0 and Odyssey) since game update 14, thus all the game data on the site and the commander data imports work only for those game versions.
20 May 2016, 3:12pm
There is limit 64kB of text/65535 characters, I hope it should be enough.
20 May 2016, 3:18pm
ArtieI am not sure if I understand correctly. Something like helpers for text editing and/or invisible table of contents?
like when programing there is a code that stops the programe reading any more on that line , so you can leave yourself messages for later .
here it would stop inara from showing that line in the sticky
ArtieThere is limit 64kB of text/65535 characters, I hope it should be enough.
i realy hope thats enough , as i dont fancy editing that much
20 May 2016, 7:20pm
Thanks for your time
CMDR Warflower, WHITE TEMPLAR SGT
20 May 2016, 7:30pm
20 May 2016, 7:38pm
WarflowerPosting here as I'm unsure where to post this but your INARA information in the Baal system is out of date. The controlling faction are the White Templars (a player minor faction)and we control Stromgren Orbital as well as Oterma station. Just happened to notice the discrepancy from the in game information and thought I would make the powers that be here aware.
Thanks for your time
CMDR Warflower, WHITE TEMPLAR SGT
Kael AubarisIf I'm not mistaken, you can actually edit that info yourself Commander Warflower.
indeed , probably taking less time than asking overworked and underpaid Artie to do it
20 May 2016, 9:11pm
Jthorpe4Is there a way of adding our "discovered by"
Not supported at this moment. Maybe it will be added with some kind of starsystem details (planets, rings, etc.) as it is more logical place for it anyway.
Greeboski
like when programing there is a code that stops the programe reading any more on that line , so you can leave yourself messages for later .
here it would stop inara from showing that line in the sticky
Hmmm, yes, I think that may be possible. In case of sticky posts it will be visible to anyone who is able to edit it (and not just author), to make it simple (but, it may be an advantage for collaboration). But I will think about it more...
WarflowerPosting here as I'm unsure where to post this but your INARA information in the Baal system is out of date...
Hello, as others said - please update whatever is needed, or add any minor faction missing here.
21 May 2016, 2:13pm
ArtieJthorpe4Is there a way of adding our "discovered by"
Not supported at this moment. Maybe it will be added with some kind of starsystem details (planets, rings, etc.) as it is more logical place for it anyway.
Cool thanks for listening
22 May 2016, 12:24pm
HeathenJester84Artie is there anywhere to do recruiting?
the general idea for recruiting is to post your info on the wing page. No shoutouts on any "thread", because it has no usage above the wing page. Every member can just look up the wing page and see for himself/herself what wing is interesting for his/her playstyle.
22 May 2016, 12:53pm
AreZeeHeathenJester84Artie is there anywhere to do recruiting?
the general idea for recruiting is to post your info on the wing page. No shoutouts on any "thread", because it has no usage above the wing page. Every member can just look up the wing page and see for himself/herself what wing is interesting for his/her playstyle.
Or you can just use the Wing Promotions tab at the top of the page.
22 May 2016, 4:16pm
I need little help with beta commodities. I believe that I collected list of every new commodity, including descriptions and where it is produced/consumed, but there are still few details missing. I need info for the following commodities: Ion Distributor, Modular Terminals, Power Transfer Bus, Radiation Baffle, Reinforced Mounting Plate and Nanobreakers. Ideally screenshots from the market screen, where is clearly visible where it is produced (some may be also limited just to area near specific star system), where it is consumed and full commodity description. All these should be in category Machinery/Technology, so it is probable that they can be found in industrial star systems, but not sure. Thank you in advance for any info.
22 May 2016, 5:28pm
23 May 2016, 7:18am
23 May 2016, 11:06am
Nightdemon00Can we have more customization in ranks? For example no pre made ranks rather you can make your own ranks and name them, add how many are allowed and a description of there job or what they are. Another idea is to have tags. Again for example one of the tags could be for founder, one for lets say 5th division and so on so fourth.
Very probably no ranks modification. There is lot of things attached to it and making it completely customizable just increase the complexity of adjacent systems and also cause mess in rank comparison between wings (nobody will know who may be responsible for what in other wings). Tags are more probable variant, I has it on the list as "honorary titles", but let's see how it will turn out. I have two things ongoing (wing roles, which will be in the upcoming update and "task forces", sometimes in the future) which are partially related to it.
Al TarfSometimes coalition is a bit loud word for wings cooperation. Can we have something like: Peace agreement, agreement on non-interference etc. Something more neutral.
Yes, it sometimes may be "too much", but sometimes it may describe the relations, depends on the participants. I needed fitting simple word for it, which will describe possible relations and as "alliance" is not an option (as it may be confused for in-game faction), the "coalition" was a logical choice.
Link to Inara Discord: https://discord.gg/qfkFWTr