Amata LireinRebecca HailAmata LireinOut of curiosity (and boredom) I ran Amata through the official D&D Alignment Test... turns out she's "Neutral Good".
What about your character(s)?
Neutral evil. Pretty fitting imho, even if the test itself is a little hard to take for an ED character.
So the Empire supporter is good and the one supporting the Fed evil? How fitting...
Yes, you kind of need to adapt some of the questions for the E:D setting, but I didn't find it that hard tbh.
It depends a bit how I interpret the different categories.
Ender is a lawless pirate/privateer that's aligned with Archon Delaine and operate within/from his territory.
If I treat "community" and country to mean those like minded, aka lawless people, Ender turns out as true neutral. If I treat the community to be the general population of the Empire, who Ender sees as enemies, he is chaotic evil. One man's hero, anothers terrorist...
I think what made him chaotic in the latter test is that he respect friends and family (who I always treated to be those like minded), with no respect for others. Since his ideals doesn't align with the non-lawless, that made him appear selfish and chaotic, while he do care for his local community of like-minded resistance of the other powers.
Short explanation of the terms (from memory):
Lawfull - Predictable actions, positive or negative
Chaotic - Unpredictable
Good - follow authority
Evil - selfish
Many think lawfull mean that you are law-abiding, which if my memory serve isn't correct. It just means that your actions are predictable.