Elite: Game talk

today, 2:04am
Constructiveness will come just wait a bit.
today, 2:34am
Why does frontier need to keep messing with the powerplay missions. I play with a group of people and we all get different mission. Thats not the problem Its consistency...... There is NONE
today, 9:35am
Do stronghold carriers have some type of rank or allegiance requirements? I did not see anything listed (and no warning about a permit) but I was not able to land on it and buy what ever I was buying.

Stronghold carrier admin: "Oi, you got a loicence for that permit!?"
;)
today, 10:05am
My Latest toy, the Vainglorious Heart


It's gilt-edged, glamorous and sleek by design
it's got its sharp edges, hidden inside
It's hard, unrestrained and it's totally cool
It teases and it pleases as you're cruising through the starlight

Over half a billion spent so far on her, and still more engineering to go, just because she's the prettiest boat in the shipyard.


AHDo stronghold carriers have some type of rank or allegiance requirements?

I presume its power play and you need to be pledged to the controlling power.
today, 10:39am
When it comes to weaponry, my Krait MK II is just as efficient than the Corvette, thanks to her 4 X 2B MODIFIED GUARDIAN PLASMA CHARGER [FIXED], her problem is overheating, the single 3C BEAM LASER [GIMBALLED] Long range ︎︎︎︎︎ Thermal Vent has a hard time cooling the ship, perhaps I should try a [FIXED] weapon instead as I have little problem staying in target with one.

Also, the PLASMA CHARGERS seems to have a mind of their own, they fire even when the trigger is fully depressed, I'll investigate this to make sure I reduce overheating.

So at the end of a sortie I often end up with structural damage, what I do now, is to Reboot and Repair to make sure I don't have to crawl to the pad during landing on the Carrier.


Last edit: 16 Nov 2024, 10:53am
today, 12:03pm
Miner WillyMy Latest toy, the Vainglorious Heart


It's gilt-edged, glamorous and sleek by design
it's got its sharp edges, hidden inside
It's hard, unrestrained and it's totally cool
It teases and it pleases as you're cruising through the starlight

Over half a billion spent so far on her, and still more engineering to go, just because she's the prettiest boat in the shipyard.




Noice, you got a loicens for that?
;)

EDSY link?
today, 3:57pm
Artie
But please, no made-up bullshit based on no facts/data/etc. here. Thank you.

This seems to be the primary thing people do in these discussions. You can't even ask a question and get an answer from anyone who actually did the thing you're asking about.
today, 7:04pm
Artie
Jawohl Duffal
No, I think FD cheated players with PMKII that's why real ED players not FDBs are not buying mandas though Starfield has not picked up so far and 2.5K of Starfielders came over bating on manda and PP2.0 that helped FD a bit.


I am not against a negative feedback towards the game/FDev here, if it's constructive at least a bit, as may be seen in the discussion multiple times. But please, no made-up bullshit based on no facts/data/etc. here. Thank you.


Herein is a brief of facts:

Initial release of PMKII for ARX is the classical case of false advertising. It was the first ARX ship which was heavily advertised by FD as a superior medium combat ship (unfounded performance claims). A lot of players bought ARX to get that ship. In reality it turned out that it is not a superior combat ship but just OK one barely surpassing MKII. Its index for OUs is only 17, yes it has SCO but players would hardly use it because of small fuel tank. When I addressed to FD that something is not right about the ship, initially they said that space was taken by SCO and 2 extra utility spots but then they mentioned that ship was nerfed on purpose otherwise the ship would be too good so it would shadow other combat ships. Now when Manda has arrived, it contrasts the above even more clear. Manda has SCO and it has matching fuel tank and its OU index is 30. Somehow SCO did not take OUs space. Another thing did you noticed the difference how advertising for Manda was done. It was done mostly by some third parties not by FD directly. FD did release short video close to launch date but they never claim that it is superior travel ship, they even were honest for a change showing that you will jump further but you will find the same FAC (Fonticulue Campestris – Amethyst). “Don't forget that no one actually needs to be deceived or misled for a court to find that an advertisement is misleading”.


Last edit: 16 Nov 2024, 7:22pm
today, 7:30pm
Jawohl Duffal
Artie
Jawohl Duffal
No, I think FD cheated players with PMKII that's why real ED players not FDBs are not buying mandas though Starfield has not picked up so far and 2.5K of Starfielders came over bating on manda and PP2.0 that helped FD a bit.



I am not against a negative feedback towards the game/FDev here, if it's constructive at least a bit, as may be seen in the discussion multiple times. But please, no made-up bullshit based on no facts/data/etc. here. Thank you.



Herein is a brief of facts:

Initial release of PMKII for ARX is the classical case of false advertising. It was the first ARX ship which was heavily advertised by FD as a superior medium combat ship (unfounded performance claims). A lot of players bought ARX to get that ship. In reality it turned out that it is not a superior combat ship but just OK one barely surpassing MKII. Its index for OUs is only 17, yes it has SCO but players would hardly use it because of small fuel tank. When I addressed to FD that something is not right about the ship, initially they said that space was taken by SCO and 2 extra utility spots but then they mentioned that ship was nerfed on purpose otherwise the ship would be too good so it would shadow other combat ships. Now when Manda has arrived, it contrasts the above even more clear. Manda has SCO and it has matching fuel tank and its OU index is 30. Somehow SCO did not take OUs space. Another thing did you noticed the difference how advertising for Manda was done. It was done mostly by some third parties not by FD directly. FD did release short video close to launch date but they never claim that it is superior travel ship, they even were honest for a change showing that you will jump further but you will find the same FAC (Fonticulue Campestris – Amethyst). “Don't forget that no one actually needs to be deceived or misled for a court to find that an advertisement is misleading”.


In short, they lied and scammed us sort of.

Post a reply

You must be signed in to post here.
Elite:Dangerous related questions, answers, tips and help. Simply anything that is directly related to the game and its gameplay goes here.
For the discussions about the community, other stuff related to the game like astrophysics and so on please use the General talk thread.

What does belong here:
  • Questions, answers, tips and guides about ship loadouts, game activities like exploration, mining, combat and similar things that directly relate to the gameplay.
  • Game technical issues and problems, if you are looking for a help. For the bug reports please head to the official FD forum.
  • Discussion about "official" events from GalNet and community goals.
What does not belong here:
  • Discussing player actions and activities, general topics about Elite community and player events, topics related to the game but also real world (like astrophysics and similar). Please post these to the "General talk" thread instead.
  • Any off topic discussion, please post this kind of stuff to the "Offtopic" thread.